Template:Did you know nominations/Félicette

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Félicette[edit]

(

)

... that Félicette, the first cat in space, was subjected to 9.5 g's of acceleration and 5 minutes of weightlessness?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chiitan
Comment: HOLD for July 2019

Improved to Good Article status by Kees08 (talk). Nominated by Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) at 11:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC).

Your call, but maybe have a hook about the surgical implants? Kees08 (Talk) 16:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Sure, Alt 1:

ALT1: ~~... that Félicette, the first cat in space, had electrodes surgically implanted in her brain to assess neurological activity?~~

Kees08, how is that? --- Coffeeandcrumbs 16:38, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Really interesting article. New GA. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Image is fair use. QPQ done.
I think the average reader will like the first hook. ALT1 seems obvious. For ALT0, the 5 minutes of weightlessness is verified and cited inline, but the 9 g's need an inline cite. Yoninah (talk) 19:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yoninah: The citation attached states in French:

"Durant les 42 secondes de poussée, la chatte, terrifiée, subit une accélération de 9,5 g."

which translates to:

"During the 42 seconds of thrust, the cat, terrified, undergoes an acceleration of 9.5 g."

Thanks for the review. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 19:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

What source? There's no inline citation after "applying 9 g's to the payload's occupant." Yoninah (talk) 20:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

The poor thing experienced 9.5 g's of acceleration during ascent and 9 g's when the parachute deployed. You are looking at the wrong sentence. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

This reference. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Facepalm Oh. Thanks. Foreign language ref AGF and cited inline. ALT0 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yoninah: sorry for the last minute tweak but I changed "was subjected to" → "experienced" for NPOV. Subjected seems too judgmental to me. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

@Coffeeandcrumbs: well, it was a scientific experiment, wasn't it? Yoninah (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Well yes. I guess that is true. I have changed it back to the original version. Never mind. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 21:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Yoninah (talk) 21:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I deliberately chose the word 'subjected' to emphasize that the experience was not voluntary (obvious at that point, but I digress). Kees08 (Talk) 19:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)