Template:Did you know nominations/Florida v. Jardines, Florida v. Harris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Florida v. Jardines, Florida v. Harris[edit]

Police dog

  • Reviewed: I still have to review another nomination and will do that shortly.
  • QPQ not necessary for editors with less than 5 DYK credits. Toolserver DYK check show this editor has only had one other DYK nomination. — Maile (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment: Two timely Supreme Court articles that I had put a LOT of time into. I could have swore the rule was 10 days, but that just may be early-onset senility setting in... One reviewer said "awesome article, good job!" I was told on the WT:DYK page to submit it anyhow... Also, I'm adding the "4 out of 5 bit" to the Florida v. Harris article now, done in a few minutes.... done.

Created by Grolltech (talk). Self nom at 01:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Light bulb iconB FYI 5-DAY timeline, Not exactly, DYK provides the leeway to IAR on the 5-day thing. This nomination is worth looking at. — Maile (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
  • For two such well written and worthwhile articles, the date of nomination can be elastic :). I consider both articles to be new enough and they are certainly long enough. They are well-referenced, the hook is sourced with appropriate inline citations and the image is appropriately licensed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you!Grollτech (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2012 (UTC)