Template:Did you know nominations/Furcifer bifidus, Furcifer cephalolepis
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Thine Antique Pen (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Furcifer bifidus, Furcifer cephalolepis[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the Furcifer bifidus and the Furcifer cephalolepis are both ranked as Least Concern?
Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 19:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
After removal of some bloat, Furcifer bifidus is too small at 1076 bytes. It is also in need of some copyediting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
