Template:Did you know nominations/Hahoe byeolsingut talnori
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hahoe byeolsingut talnori[edit]
- ... that the ribald Korean dance-drama Hahoe byeolsingut talnori features a lecherous apostate priest and a micturating dancing girl?
Created/expanded by Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk). Self nom at 13:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- The word "lecherous", which appears in the hook, doesn't appear in the article. If the offline source can support it, the word should be added to the article. If not, it should be deleted from the hook. Otherwise, this meets criteria as a new article of size, with proper citations, AGF on offline. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Also, is there any reason we're using the word "micturate", which I didn't know, rather than "urinate", which I believe most English speakers will know? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hello; (1) While the word "lecherous" may not appear, there is referenced support for "having or showing excessive or offensive sexual desire" - does that not suffice? happy for it to be cut if not; (2) three main reasons I guess: (a) wouldn't want to lower the tone of DYK; (b) this is an education project - great to have some vocab-building along the way; (c) as per all those books where the naughty bits are translated into Latin, hopefully those of sufficient letters to understand have also sufficient maturity not to be led astray by such depravity! Thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Good enough explanations for me, though I added the word "lecherous" to the article so the hook backs up the article. I presume that the one source at the end of the paragraph covers the whole paragraph, and individual sentences do not need to be cited by the same source. As for micturating vs. urinating, it wouldn't lower the tone of DYK, and the more commonly known word might draw more interest, so I would recommend using the more commonly known word. AGF on offline source. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hello; (1) While the word "lecherous" may not appear, there is referenced support for "having or showing excessive or offensive sexual desire" - does that not suffice? happy for it to be cut if not; (2) three main reasons I guess: (a) wouldn't want to lower the tone of DYK; (b) this is an education project - great to have some vocab-building along the way; (c) as per all those books where the naughty bits are translated into Latin, hopefully those of sufficient letters to understand have also sufficient maturity not to be led astray by such depravity! Thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the ribald Korean dance-drama Hahoe byeolsingut talnori features a lecherous apostate priest and a urinating dancing girl?