Template:Did you know nominations/Henri-Edmond Cross

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 04:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Henri-Edmond Cross[edit]

Dormeuse nue dans la clairière by Henri-Edmond Cross, 1907

  • ... that painter Henri-Edmond Cross (example painting pictured) changed his name twice, each time to avoid confusion with a similarly-named artist?
  • Reviewed: Leichtgesinnte Flattergeister, BWV 181
  • Comment: DYKcheck fails, as it doesn't take into account the plagiarism which I removed (see the first edit on February 14). Please check expansion manually.

Created/expanded by Mandarax (talk). Self nom at 21:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Article has not been expanded five fold. --LauraHale (talk) 04:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes it has. See my comment above. The version which removed the plagiarism was 973 prose characters. It's currently 8304, an expansion of over eight and a half times. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 05:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Newnewss measures are:

  • been created (sandbox → mainspace is eligible); or
  • had its prose portion expanded at least fivefold; or
  • had its prose portion expanded at least twofold (only applies to BLPs that were completely unreferenced before expansion)

Expansion clock based on that as I understand it is this source here. If there was copyright and there is an exclusion, will finish the review but please cite where it says that expansions after copyright violation removed reset the expansion length. --LauraHale (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

  • The version you linked to is the one just prior to the one I linked to, which removed copyright violations. According to rule A4, copyright violations are excluded from expansion calculation. Thanks. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 10:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 21:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


---

  • on length being accurate. Plagiarism that had existed in the article removed. The current book sources are free of plagiarism. The hook related text in the article is supported by the book sources.
  • Article is fully supported by inline sources. Images on page have copyright tags that work. Article is neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. Plagiarism spot check here and here does not give me any major cause for concern. --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Good to go. Sorry about the problems. My fault. :( --LauraHale (talk) 01:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

No problem – there are a lot of rules! Thanks for the review. Oh, and your mentioning the image licenses reminded me that I can use even better ones. They're currently life + 70 years; I'll go change them to life + 100 years. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 02:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)