Template:Did you know nominations/Ian Hummer

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Ian Hummer's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC).

Ian Hummer, 2012–13 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team, 2012–13 Harvard Crimson men's basketball team, 2012–13 Ivy League men's basketball season[edit]

( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links:
)

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 15:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Answer: no, you will need to review four articles, one for each article nominated here. The consensus a few months back was that each article in a nomination requires its own QPQ; please see WP:DYKSG#H4 for the rule as it is now. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't see why not. You haven't used it up before now. I understand why you missed the QPQ issue in the Roupala review, though... BlueMoonset (talk) 23:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Review needed now that QPQ issue has been resolved. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I am not sure how the QPQ count here is affected. That hook had three articles. This one has four. I thought I could make up the difference with my 4th credit above.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
  • As I said above, "I don't see why not"; it's article for article, and as long as you supply four reviews, in whatever combination (single, double, triple, etc.), you should be fine. Three Roupalas and one Adae totals four. This is the fourth of the five Adae, leaving you one more from that quintet. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I misintrepretted the symbol as meaning that something was wrong with my nomination here. I now understand that you were just calling for a review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Now that this DYK has been around so long we might as well put it on the main page during the February 16 Harvard-Princeton game.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Reiterating need for a reviewer of all four articles and the hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Good to go. QPQ checked by BlueMoonset, New Enough: all 4 good (2 new, 2 5x of content), Long enough: all 4 good, Within policy: checked three sources on each articles and no hits for close paraphrasing. The BLP article is neutral and clearly referenced (with BLP tag on talk page). Some non-neutral sources (i.e. GoPrincetonTigers.com) on the 2012-2013 season pages, but usage is not problematic (used for clear facts like scores and are supported by additional sources in articles). Hook All facts in hook are supported in sources and are in the articles. "ensnared in cheating scandal" seems like an appropriate (and based on sources) not-overly-negative description for the hook. Hook is exactly 200 characters. Good to go. Maybe enough lead time for running on February 16. AbstractIllusions (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Ian_Hummer&oldid=1031308423"