Template:Did you know nominations/James F. Kelley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

James F. Kelley

  • ... that in 1991, James F. Kelley claimed that he had been ordered to repatriate Amelia Earhart (who disappeared in 1937) to the United States where she lived as Irene Craigmile Bolam? Source: "Amelia Earhart vanished nearly 70 years ago, but her fate remains one of the nation’s great mysteries. The pioneering aviator disappeared on July 2, 1937, as she was flying an equatorial route around the globe.... In 1991, he went to New Jersey to interview Msgr. James Francis Kelley, 89, a retired psychologist, who affirmed that he had been commissioned by then-Archbishop Francis Joseph Spellman to bring Amelia Earhart back to the United States after the war and help give her a new identity." Los Angeles Times

Created by Alansohn (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 03:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC).

  • @Thriley: It has been several weeks since the nomination and yet no QPQ has been provided. Per DYK guidelines, please provide one within a week, otherwise the nomination may be rejected. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 15:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Since a QPQ has been provided, this is ready for a full review. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Sources are predominantly from The New York Times.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Adequate, but skimpy.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Not applicable
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Not applicable
7. Overall assessment. An adequate article. Passes DYK. Could use info on how Kelley supposedly repatriated Earhart.Georgejdorner (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)