Template:Did you know nominations/Jerichow (film)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 01:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Jerichow (film)[edit]

(

)

... that the German drama film Jerichow was nominated for the 2009 German Film Prize in both the Best Feature Film and Best Director categories?

Reviewed: Blam (Roy Lichtenstein)

Created/expanded by SL93 (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by SL93 (talk) at 23:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

I've changed "Jethrow" to "Jerichow" in the hook, as it looked like a strange typo to me. If "Jethrow" is correct for some reason, that needs to be added to the article. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 00:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

That quote from Ebert is much too long. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- Dr. Blofeld added that. It originally just said that Roger Ebert gave the film a positive review. I changed it. SL93 (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
  - A small quote is okay... just not one that is a third of the length of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
    - I added in a small quote. SL93 (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
    - I have also sourced the citation need to The Boston Globe. In source - "Instead of a beautiful young FEMME FATALE married to a much older man, we have a beautiful, not-so-young ex-con married to a rich, hard-working and enterprising Turkish immigrant." SL93 (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
      - Alright, although I note that PW has a clearer indication that it is based on the novel. Also, reading the sources (no close paraphrasing found) it seems that a couple things, such as the role of poverty and that Ebert gave it 3/4 stars, may be a good way to expand the article (I tend to exclude the plot in length limits for my own articles, although it's not a DYK rule so I can't push that on you) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
        I was thinking about adding about the poverty, but I thought that would go into the plot and not critical detail. I don't like long plot sections even though I consider them as a part of the length limit. SL93 (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

A themes section? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- I might add it, but that isn't a DYK requirement. If this was going to be a Good Article, that would be understandable. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
  - I meant for the poverty. I will, reluctantly, pass this as is since it meets the criteria, although I am unhappy with the length. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)