Template:Did you know nominations/Lewis and Clark County Hospital Historic District
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 22:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Lewis and Clark County Hospital Historic District[edit]
- ... that the location of a cemetery and its over 350 graves on the grounds of Lewis and Clark County Hospital Historic District (pictured) is unknown?
- Reviewed: Minetta Creek
Created/expanded by PumpkinSky (talk). Self nom at 00:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Hook is properly formatted. Article is new enough and long enough. QPQ is done. Images have copyright tags. Hooked fact is found in article and supported by inline citation. Article is completely supported by inline citation. Article is neutral enough.
Book sources not plagiarised and support text.
Random quotation marks? "ct."[2] The modern garage is of frame construction and built in the early 1990s. It is slightly north of the residence and has asphalt shingles and two garage doors. The concrete garage is just northwest of the modern garage and was built after 1950 with a raised concrete foundation and has green asphalt shingles. "Because the façade of the concrete garage has been altered with modern brickwork, stucco, and siding, the building does not contribute to the district."[2]" See them? What exactly is being quoted? It is unclear from the article. --LauraHale (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Clarify quotation marks. --LauraHale (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see why you call them random. this ---""Because the ambulance garage has been connected to the concrete garage via a modern addition on its south elevation, the original garage doors have been infilled, and the window opening at the north side has been converted to a door, the garage it does not retain integrity of design, workmanship, or association. It is therefore a non-contributing building within the historic district."" and this---""Because the façade of the concrete garage has been altered with modern brickwork, stucco, and siding, the building does not contribute to the district.""...are being quoted. If you have a reword idea that will avoid claims of copyvio, etc, I'm all ears. PumpkinSky talk 00:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't see the opening quote and one of them came right after a citation. Ah crap. This is going to be me having moment of reading fail. Can you put something in the text to make the fact that these are quotes stand out a bit more? Because two sentences are quotes in there for a 24 words in one case and 62 words in another case. They aren't off set in any way to indicate they are quotes, nor is there anything that says According to BLAH, "THIS QUOTED FACT." --LauraHale (talk) 01:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Reworded both. let me know if they're not sufficiently changed. PumpkinSky talk 01:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't see the opening quote and one of them came right after a citation. Ah crap. This is going to be me having moment of reading fail. Can you put something in the text to make the fact that these are quotes stand out a bit more? Because two sentences are quotes in there for a 24 words in one case and 62 words in another case. They aren't off set in any way to indicate they are quotes, nor is there anything that says According to BLAH, "THIS QUOTED FACT." --LauraHale (talk) 01:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Quote problem resolved. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)