Template:Did you know nominations/List of longest streams of Idaho

The following is an archived discussion of List of longest streams of Idaho's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

List of longest streams of Idaho[edit]

(

)

... that 70 rivers and creeks on the list of longest streams of Idaho are over 50 miles (80 km) long?

Reviewed: Tamoya ohboya

Moved to mainspace by Little Mountain 5 (talk). Self nom at 04:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

. Very good listing. All DYK rules followed. Good to go.--Nvvchar. 07:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Is this really long enough? I know DYKcheck gives 1581 characters, but I'm dubious about counting the 401-character third paragraph since it's really just an explanation of table sources and a key to the table. Does anyone have any thoughts about whether this should count? The list itself is impressive, but it's the 1500 prose character minimum that's in issue; I think they're supposed to be about the topic, not go into table units. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I would go with it, because a) this is already nearly featured quality and b) the coding of lists can take much more time than writing text. Description of the table is a necessary part of lists. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)