Template:Did you know nominations/Nat Caldwell
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 22:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nat Caldwell and Gene Graham[edit]
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
... that Nat Caldwell went undercover as a nursing home resident?
- ALT1:
... that Nat Caldwell uncovered elder abuse while posing as a nursing home resident? - ALT2:... that Nat Caldwell and Gene Graham exposed the sweetheart deal that kept miners from being treated for black lung disease?
- Reviewed: Gérard Lhéritier, Joanne Cardsley
- Comment: Is it possible to do a twofer, as in ALT2? If so, I think it may be most interesting.
- ALT1:
Created by AdventurousSquirrel (talk). Self-nominated at 23:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC).
- AdventurousSquirrel, twofers are definitely possible. You could even go for a threefer or beyond if you had that many articles ready at one time and a workable hook that included them all. I've just added Gene Graham to this nomination page; since the Graham article was created on April 7 it definitely qualifies. You will have to supply a second QPQ review. I've struck the single-article hooks on the assumption that you'll want to proceed with both articles. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks BlueMoonset! You were right to assume, despite what any crass proverb warns about doing so. I'll find a second QPQ to do. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- QPQ done! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 10:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Full review needed of both articles and hook now that the second QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Both articles are long enough (7893 characters and 4862 characters respectively) and both are new enough. Caldwell was created 7 days before nomination and Graham 5 days before nomination. Both are neutral in tone and cite reliable sources with inline citations. Earwig tool and spot checks found no copyvio or close paraphrasing issues. The hook is short enough, properly formatted, accurate and interesting, and the hook fact is cited inline in both articles. QPQs have been done for both nominations. HazelAB (talk) 14:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
