Template:Did you know nominations/Parnham House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Parnham House[edit]

Parnham House in 2011
Parnham House in 2011

Created by Joseph2302 (talk) and No Swan So Fine (talk). Nominated by Joseph2302 (talk) at 23:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC).

  • On ALT 2, "badly destroyed" doesn't read right. Should be either "badly damaged" or "destroyed" but not "badly destroyed" (if it was destroyed, of course the damage was bad!) Neutralitytalk 05:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • The article is created and nominated on 15 April. QPQ is done. I prefer original ALT. Reference 4 does not support the statements it says it does. So I have made some rearrangement of references and put citation needed tag accordingly. Ref 12 and 13 are not accessible at this point of time. Will try again later. - Vivvt (Talk) 06:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Neutrality ALT2 changed, so it actually makes sense. Vivvt Fixed refs that didn't work, and there are no outstanding citation needed tags. Also added No Swan So Fine as a contributor to this DYK, as he's written a significant part of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Source fixes are correct. This is good to go! - Vivvt (Talk) 12:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • @Joseph2302 and Vivvt: I came to promote this, but the fact about the Victoria Cross is not in the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: Apologies. Ref 9 mentions about Victoria Cross but now I realize that rest two sources are inaccessible as of now. I got confused with ref and article context. Apologies again. - Vivvt (Talk) 07:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
That's OK. If Joseph2302 adds the fact to the article, we can restore the tick and go ahead with this hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Cwmhiraeth Added to article. Apologies for delay, I was away. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Restoring tick for original hook as per Vivvt. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)