Template:Did you know nominations/Pemberton-Billing P.B.1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Pemberton-Billing P.B.1[edit]

Created/expanded by MilborneOne (talk), Nigel Ish (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 01:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Unfortunately the article falls short of the 1500 characters required (1243). Even with the specificatation section, which in my opinion would not qualify as readable prose.--Ykraps (talk) 07:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Dang DYKcheck...sometimes it counts the specs headers and sometimes not. Odd. Anyway, I've done some wordsmithing and I believe the actual prose is over 1500 characters now. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • New enough, interesting enough (if your keen on aviation) and now long enough. Hook interesting and cited in article. Reliable sources used but unable to verify so accepted in good faith.--Ykraps (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)