Template:Did you know nominations/Perdur Radhakantha Adiga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Perdur Radhakantha Adiga[edit]

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 13:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Everything checks out except for the fact that the article doesn't cite the source you've listed here for the relevant fact. The closest reference is to the Indian National Science Academy (ref #5), which only partially supports the claim. Also, maybe it would be good to link oxalyldiaminopropionic acid (and use the slightly less-intimidating format) in the hook? Otherwise fully eligible. – Juliancolton | Talk 21:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks @Juliancolton:, but it is clearly mentioned in the article I linked. During this time, he initiated work on the unusual amino acid, N-oxalyl-diaminopropionic acid, neurotoxin present in Lathyrus sativus. The group demonstrated by elegant experiments that this compound was responsible for the debilitating neurological disease, neurolathyrism, prevalent in large tracts of North India (starts with line 10 of paragraph II). The previous sentence in the article has inline citation (ref# 7) based on this link, so I did not repeat it again. I have also given below an ALT. jojo@nthony (talk) 06:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
The reference must appear after the information it supports, naturally. Otherwise it's essentially an unsourced claim. If you moved ref #7 to after the neurolathyrism statement, that would address my concerns. – Juliancolton | Talk 15:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
@Juliancolton:, I have added citation at the end of the sentence. Trust this suffices. jojo@nthony (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks good. I've suggested a second Alt hook with perhaps more concise wording. – Juliancolton | Talk 19:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)