Template:Did you know nominations/Pony ride

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Pony ride[edit]

A pony ready to give a pony ride
A pony ready to give a pony ride
  • ALT1: ... that rule of thumb for a pony ride (pony pictured) is that the legs of the child should reach at least halfway down the sides of the pony?
  • ALT2 ... that ponies used for pony rides (pictured) need to be quiet, well-trained, and desensitized to children, noise, and crowds?
  • ALT3... that pony rides (pony pictured) are considered a high risk equine activity?
  • Reviewed: Drei Chöre, Op. 6
  • Comment: Image is optional, the article has more, I'm also open to "hookier" hook ideas. (The best image, though, has a child wearing a ball cap and not a helmet, so not suitable if ALT0 hook is used...) ALT0 verified by fn 2 and 7. ALT1 verified by fn 3, ALT2 verified by fn 2 and 3, ALT3 verified by fn 3. People on my talk page recommended these hoos and so I'm adding them all, letting the reviewer and promoters choose their favorites. Montanabw(talk) 20:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Montanabw (talk). Self-nominated at 21:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 20:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 7570 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (19.4% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Nominated within seven day timeline, and is long enough. QPQ review done. Copyvio unlikely. All hooks are sourced to reliable sources, netural, and interesting. Image is correctly licensed. I prefer ALT2. GTG. MWright96 (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2016 (UTC)