Template:Did you know nominations/Protopulvinaria pyriformis
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Protopulvinaria pyriformis
- ... that unlike most soft scale insects, the adult female pyriform scale is able to move around? Source: "Unlike most other Coccidae, the female of P. pyriformis is capable of movement."
- Reviewed: Silas Papare
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC).
New, in time, long enough, sourced, inline hook citation checks out, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. Cwmhiraeth, here and in the article, should it be "soft-scale insects" (with hyphen)? Also, why is the line Male individuals are not known in South Africa, but have been observed in Florida.
in "Description" rather than "Distribution" (and surely if female individuals are known in South Africa, male ones must be too, even if yet unobserved?)? --Usernameunique (talk) 07:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique: Thank you for your review. Answering your points in order:- "soft scale" and "soft-scale" are both widely used; It's in the description section because the description is of female scales, and although males sometimes occur, I don't know what they look like; this insect largely exists in entirely female populations, the presence of males may be triggered by some environmental factor, but the species can get along quite well without them. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
