Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Armstrong (museum director)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Richard Armstrong (museum director)[edit]

(
)

Created/expanded by Ssilvers (talk). Nominated by Pgallert (talk) at 10:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

  • - new article, of appropriate length, hook is cited, no copyvio found. However, I'm wary of putting a hook on the main page calling a BLP subject "controversial". I would suggest you feel around for a hook that's a little less BLPishly worrisome. This is my first DYK review. DYK stalkers, please feel free to chime in and tell me if I'm wrong on this. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
  • There is nothing pejorative in calling someone "controversial", and if you read Krens's article, he certainly was proudly controversial. However, an ALT hook could be:
... that Richard Armstrong became director of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation in 2008, bringing a curatorial background to the position? -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
I agree that's it's not necessarily pejorative, but I'm being overly cautious because, well, neither you (I assume) nor I wants to have Main Page watchers baying for our blood because of an infelicitous wording. Your alt hook checks out fine as far as I'm concerned. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 00:21, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Richard_Armstrong_(museum_director)&oldid=829251468"