Template:Did you know nominations/Rocky the Musical

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 03:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Rocky the Musical[edit]

Created by Blethering Scot (talk). Self nominated at 22:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC).

  • This interesting and well citationed article needs one or two things to qualify.
1.) Article is newly expanded. Note, the header on DYK check is unaware that the expansion work on this article started less than 5 days before the DYK-nom, but there was hiatus of changes to article between 24 October and 27 December. Article was 720 characters on 24 October 2013 and 2644 on 29 December 2013, so it is at least 956 characters short of "fivefold" expansion.
2.) Article is in excess of 1,500 characters, so long enough.
3.) The fact in the hook is cited with inline citation in article.
3a.) The hook is short enough.
4.) Appears to be within policy.
5.) I do not see a QPQ at present, but I do not know if the nominator has more than five DYKs.
Summary: Article needs at least another 956 characters to fulfill the expansion requirements, writer needs to do a QPQ unless they are too new at DYK for that requirement to be enforced.
I enjoyed reading the article, I had no idea anyone would translate a whole musical to German for the opening! Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
  • QPQ Check shows only 4 previous DYKs, so no QPQ is necessary for this one.
  • This is a new article as of Dec 29, not an expansion. It was being worked on in user space until "Article moved from User:Blethering Scot/Rocky the Musical on December 29, 2013", and the date it was moved is the one that qualifies it as new for DYK. Length is fine for new article.
  • Toolserver and Labs are "server temporarily unavailable", but there is no note above on checking for copyvio. I'll return and do the check when the Labs server is back up. — Maile (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Spot check of Duplication Detector comes up clean. No other outstanding issues, so this one is good 2 go. — Maile (talk) 13:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for finishing this one, I didn't catch that the article was moved, so sorry! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)