Template:Did you know nominations/Satyavadi Raja Harishchandra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Satyavadi Raja Harishchandra's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 15:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC).

Satyavadi Raja Harishchandra[edit]

Dadasaheb Phalke

ALT1: ... that the original reels of India's first feature film Raja Harishchandra (1913) are lost and available reels are believed to be of its shorter version Satyavadi Raja Harishchandra (1917)?
  • Reviewed: Mohini Bhasmasur
  • Comment: Requested for 3rd May: 100 years of Indian cinema celebrations.

5x expanded by Vivvt (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Vivvt (talk) at 02:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Length is good, neutral, sources, and has been expanded given the day at which it was nominated. I would personally prefer ALT 1 as it is more interesting. Good to go! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review, Vibhijain. - Vivvt (Talk) 11:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

There is some dispute that the reels in the National Film Archive of India are of Raja Harishchandra or this film. The hook does not convey this. "the original reels of India's first feature film Raja Harishchandra (1913) are lost" is stated as a fact, not an opinion. Suggest ALT2 ... that some historians believe that presumed reels of India's first feature film Raja Harishchandra (1913) are actually of its remake Satyavadi Raja Harishchandra (1917)? --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

  • I am OK with the ALT change. Let me know if article also needs to be changed. - Vivvt (Talk) 20:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes. Please for neutrality. With golden word "some". Redtigerxyz Talk 17:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Done. - Vivvt (Talk) 23:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

The article is also updated. Redtigerxyz Talk 02:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks. - Vivvt (Talk) 04:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)