Template:Did you know nominations/Should've Said No

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Should've Said No

Improved to Good Article status by Ippantekina (talk). Self-nominated at 13:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Congrats on the GA! Innisfree987 (talk) 23:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Oops, need to tweak the hook after double-checking the quote; let’s also clarify that those were TS’s words:
Does that work for you, Ippantekina? Innisfree987 (talk) 03:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Works for me, @Innisfree987:! Ippantekina (talk) 03:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Excellent, good to go! Innisfree987 (talk) 04:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)