Template:Did you know nominations/Sinn Féin Funds case
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sinn Féin Funds case[edit]
... that the ruling in the 1948 Sinn Féin Funds case was that the Sinn Féin party was not legally a continuation of the Sinn Féin party that governed the Irish Republic during the Anglo-Irish War?
- Reviewed: I have fewer than five DYK credits
Created by Jnestorius (talk). Nominated by Scolaire (talk) at 10:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC).
- I suggest reordering to "that the 1948 ruling in the Sinn Féin Funds case" since the case ran from 1942 to 1948 and there was a separate significant ruling in 1947. jnestorius(talk) 17:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the 1948 ruling in the Sinn Féin Funds case was that the Sinn Féin party was not legally a continuation of the Sinn Féin party that governed the Irish Republic during the Anglo-Irish War?
This article is new enough and long enough. The ALT1 hook has better word order than the original and has inline citations. The article is neutral. It uses precise legal terminology and most sources are offline, so I am unable to assess whether there are any copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
