Template:Did you know nominations/South Africa Red Ensign
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
South Africa Red Ensign[edit]
.svg)
The South Africa Red Ensign
... that the South Africa Red Ensign (pictured) was unofficial as South Africa's national flag but took 3 years of negotiations to officially replace?
- ALT1:... that the South Africa Red Ensign (pictured) was raised over Windhoek following the conquest of German South West Africa in 1915?
- Reviewed: Lettonie (restaurant)
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 15:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 14:19, 02 September 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2347 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (15.3% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The media File:Red Ensign of South Africa (1912-1928).svg is free-use
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 132 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 123 characters
- ✓ The C of E has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Lettonie (restaurant) was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
This article is long enough and new enough. The image is suitably licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. I have struck the original hook as being poorly expressed and am approving ALT1, which has an inline citation to what appears to be a reliable source. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}