Template:Did you know nominations/St. Leonhard, Frankfurt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

St. Leonhard, Frankfurt[edit]

Floorplan of St. Leonhard
Floorplan of St. Leonhard

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 21:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Hi Gerda Arendt, review follows: Article created 1 November; Article of sufficient length; Article is well cited to reliable sources; Article is almost entirely derived from German sources so close paraphrasing not an issue; Hook fact is mentioned in article, is cited to a German source but I am happy to AGF on this; Floor plan image is from an 1896 book, now in public domain - it was missing a US public domain tag but I have added this; QPQ in progress - Dumelow (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
  • @Gerda Arendt: I see that the church had a late Gothic choir added in around 1425, and was remodelled to a hall church between 1508 and 1520. Where does the article state that the hall church was in a late Gothic style? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  • No, the article is not restricted to 200 characters and thus can describe the two major steps from Romanesque to Gothic in more detail. Do you see all the Gothic vaults in the floor plan? Do we really have to say Gothic again for the 2nd step? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  • You cannot deduce it is in late Gothic style from an unannotated floor plan. When the article explicitly states that it was remodelled to a hall church in late Gothic style, I will replace the tick for the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  • I can deduce that, also from the timing, - what other style would there have been then??? - But I'll do as you say.