Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Enterprise

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  01:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Star Trek: Enterprise[edit]

Scott Bakula in 2005
Scott Bakula in 2005

Improved to Good Article status by Miyagawa (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • This article was Listed as a Good Article on 15:27, 26 August 2016
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 41561 characters
    • Paragraphs [5] (thumb|left|alt=A ... Enterprise.),[10] (thumb|left|alt=A ... Enterprise.),[13] (thumb|right|alt=A ... season.),[16] (thumb|left|alt=Three ... Archer.),[19] (thumb|right|alt=A ... series.) in this article lack a citation.
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 20.6% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Bot seems to be picking up some of the images as paragraphs and failing to find citations for them, and the copyright violation appears to be simply the titles of the various Star Trek series. Miyagawa (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Way to kill the franchise Bakula! In all seriousness. Date and length fine. I can't clear the original as it doesn't say he was the only one necessarily considered at least not in the way I read it, maybe the hook could be made clearer in the article. Alt2 seems more about Armstrong, not ENT. Therefore I approve ALT1 but the original can be used if it is made clearer in the article. QPQ done. No close para (despite the autoreview). Good to go for Star Trek Day (though it's no Captain Picard Day!). The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)