Template:Did you know nominations/Sun Lounge (railcar)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Sun Lounge (railcar)[edit]

Postcard of a Sun Lounge interior

Created by Mackensen (talk). Self nominated at 17:42, 24 May 2014 (UTC).

  • This is my first review, so would appreciate somebody checking my work. Article is new enough (created today). Article is long enough (2956 characters of prose). I don't see any policy issues. Hook is correctly formatted, good length, interesting, neutral, and correctly cited in the article. I don't have access to the off-line source, so I can't verify the accuracy. I don't know how to perform the QPQ check. The image appears to be Public Domain (but I'm not an expert on such matters). I think there is a problem with the quality of the image at small sizes. The 150 x 98 thumbnail is almost unrecognizable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoySmith (talkcontribs) 20:19 24 May 2014
  • RoySmith, you've done a pretty good review for your first time out. Here's some supplementary info:
  • QPQ is required. Although QPQ checker has been down since earlier this month, Mackensen has had more than 5 previous DYKs.
  • Duplication Detector run on all online sourcing showed no issues of concern.
  • Dablinks tool showed no issues.
  • Checklinks tool showed no issues of concern.
  • The citation for the hook is not actually a subscription, but a link to its WorldCat (catalog) listing. I did do a Google Books search, and there is nothing at Google. So, we Assume Good Faith (AGF) on the source
  • The image is really pleasing, and it is sourced at Commons under PD due to its original date of 1964. But as every browser is different, I would leave it up to the promoter if they want to use the image.
  • So, really, everything checks out except that Mackensen needs to do a QPQ review. Once that is done, I think this article can go. — Maile (talk) 15:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
    Reviewed Mary's Club. Maile66; I'm glad you like the image. It's been on the project for years but I never had the sources to build an article around it. Mackensen (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  • All criteria now met. This nomination is good 2 go. — Maile (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)