The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Overall: Looks good. No copyvio concerns. I can only imagine the monumental effort that went into summarizing the plots of those long books. I prefer the "androgynous" angle behind the first hook, although the wording seems a bit clunky, because what's "pictured" of course is not a pen name, but the author. But it works. Kevin1776 (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Using (author pictured) instead of (pictured) might make it sound better. Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)