Template:Did you know nominations/Tony Vernon
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 15:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tony Vernon[edit]
- ... that prior to becoming Kraft Foods' chief executive officer, Tony Vernon worked for over two decades for Johnson & Johnson?
- Reviewed: 2nd of 7 QPQs against Template:Did you know nominations/Italian cruisers.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nominated at 14:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC).
- Did he testify in any lawsuits? EEng (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- With trepidation I have googled "Tony Vernon" lawsuit and "Tony Vernon" testify snd not found anything.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thank GOODNESS! EEng (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
The lead section of the article mentions that Vernon had a 23 year career at Johnson & Johnson but the sentence in the "Career" section does not. The Bloomberg source mentions a 26 year career in the healthcare industry, principally at J&J but with the last three years with Ripplewood Holdings. Can we deduce from this that he was with J&J for more than two decades? Probably. But I think this needs to be stated in the referenced sentence in the career section to comply with DYK rules. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thank GOODNESS! EEng (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough and the hook fact is now reliably sourced. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright/close paraphrasing issues. (I hope you will soon remove the major restructuring tag.) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
