Template:Did you know nominations/Transformer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Transformer[edit]

DBZ trafo

  • ... that the two basic transformer (pictured) constructions in common use today are based on designs described in patent applications from 1885?
  • Reviewed: Not a self-nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Cblambert (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 03:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC).

Power transformer inrush current caused by residual flux at switching instant; flux (green), iron core's magnetic characteristics (red) and magnetizing current (blue)

  • My scientific capabilities are limited, but it seems like a more hooky fact could be derived from this article. And maybe a more dynamic image, like the one at right (that is also used in the article)? Cbl62 (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The above comment is not intended as a review, just a drive-by observation. Cbl62 (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
    Good to Go. It was brought to Good Article status within time limit. Definitely long enough. Article is neutral, cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. Picture is free. No QPQ required. Personally as previously being in the electrical engineering field before retiring, I like the original picture and to me applies better to the field and easier to understand than the alternate image proposed. And I might add the blue transformer on the green platform looks much nicer. The original hook makes perfect sense to me (sounds good) and is verified in reference source.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)