Template:Did you know nominations/USS Callister
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
USS Callister[edit]
.jpg)
Cristin Milioti
- ... that Cristin Milioti (pictured) describes her character Nanette Cole from the Black Mirror episode "USS Callister" as "a woman in charge [fighting] against a small-minded, misogynist bully"? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that critics of Black Mirror episode "USS Callister" have compared the actions of Robert Daly, played by Jesse Plemons, to alleged sexual abuse committed by Harvey Weinstein? Source: [2][3][4]
Improved to Good Article status by Bilorv (talk). Self-nominated at 15:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC).
- QPQ now done: Apple Venus Volume 1. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 17:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: an image of Jesse Plemons, who plays Daly, (File:Jesse Plemons (20769593584).jpg) could be used if ALT1 is chosen. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 15:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
.jpg){kind=link}
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Good to go with main or ALT1 hook Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: I noticed you moved the hook to Prep 2 but placed it in a middle spot, without the image. Was this an accidental oversight? Both of the hooks were approved with images. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 11:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: Many more hooks are nominated to DYK with an image than it is possible to promote to the image slots. In this case, the article was about an episode of a TV series and although relevant to the hook, the image was peripheral to the episode. So it was not an accidental oversight but an encyclopedic decision. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: okay, I empathise with this problem, but the hook has been sitting here for (almost) a full month – I presume the reason is that admins have been waiting for an open lead slot to put it in. It seems quite unfair to leave the hook for a month and then dump it in a middle slot anyway when without the image, it would probably have taken at most a week to be sent to a prep. This is my first time submitting an image hook and I won't waste my time with it in future if it's going to cause a delay and then be ignored anyway. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 13:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- If you look at the pink box titled "Count of DYK Hooks" at the top of the DYK nominations page you will currently see 292 hooks of which 146 have been reviewed. We are running one set of 8 hooks per day at the moment so it will take about 18 days to work through the approved hooks. Your nomination was reviewed promptly but has had to wait its turn. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: okay, I empathise with this problem, but the hook has been sitting here for (almost) a full month – I presume the reason is that admins have been waiting for an open lead slot to put it in. It seems quite unfair to leave the hook for a month and then dump it in a middle slot anyway when without the image, it would probably have taken at most a week to be sent to a prep. This is my first time submitting an image hook and I won't waste my time with it in future if it's going to cause a delay and then be ignored anyway. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 13:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: Many more hooks are nominated to DYK with an image than it is possible to promote to the image slots. In this case, the article was about an episode of a TV series and although relevant to the hook, the image was peripheral to the episode. So it was not an accidental oversight but an encyclopedic decision. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)