Template:Did you know nominations/Veton Berisha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Veton Berisha[edit]

Created/expanded by Mentoz86 (talk). Self nom at 22:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

  • QPQ done. Article is new enough and long enough. Person appears to have played in top division football and thus should pass football notability guidelines. Article is fully supported by inline citations. Article has moments where I go "Err" in terms of talking about his feelings but I don't think they necessarily arise to neutrality problems and fanboyism. Manual check of Google translation versions of Norwegian into English shows no cause for concern plagiarism wise. No images to check copyright wise. Hooked fact found in article and supported by source when checked in translation. Hook is neutral enough. --LauraHale (talk) 09:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 09:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the review, I didn't believe it would be reviewed this fast. :) I realized that the brothers Fjetland don't have wiki-articles, and I'm currently working on these. If I find those two articles good enough for DYK, I'll turn this hook into a multiple-article hook instead. In the meantime I'm marking this so that it wont be moved to a prep-area. Mentoz86 (talk) 10:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Just ping me when you decide and if you require a second review for a second hooked article. :) --LauraHale (talk) 10:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I've now finished the articles on the Fjetland-brothers, but I don't know how to do the formatting for credits. Do I need additional QPQ's ? Mentoz86 (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Two new articles added to hook are notable having played in top league, new enough and long enough. The information in the article is cited and no plagiarism concerns on based on manual check of sources. Hooked fact supported by first article. No images to check copyright wise. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk)