Template:Did you know nominations/Will Rogers Memorial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by North America1000 01:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Will Rogers Museum[edit]

Will Rogers Memorial Museum
Will Rogers Memorial Museum
  • Image:File:Will rogers Museum 1.JPG

Created/expanded by Bruin2 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC).

  • Passes 5x expansion, meets policy. @Bruin2: I think that ALT1 has the most interesting nugget but it doesn't actually link the article! Can you rephrase that hook? Also, we're still missing your review here. SFB 00:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi SFB. I have rephrased ALT1 below as ALT2 to address your comment. One problem, by my count ALT2 contains 203 characters, including spaces. If this is objectionable, then we can replace the first use of Oklahoma with state to get below the limit of 200.

I propose to use my review of the Royal Stag article as the QPQ.

Thanks for your helpful comments. Bruin2 (talk) 05:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Since the hook is too long, I'd like to suggest dropping the first "Oklahoma" entirely, and also shortening the second "Will Rogers" to "Rogers":
I have also properly bolded the article link in the ALT2a hook, which is 188 characters. (Shorter is better.) I struck ALT2 as it was over the maximum. I've also corrected the actual name of the article in the hook, DYK nom page and DYKmake templates, and properly added the image. Note that the review needs expansion so it mentions what exactly was checked (age, close paraphrasing, neutrality, free image, and so on). BlueMoonset (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi BlueMoonset and SFB. I think ALT2a is quite acceptable as the hook. Let's run with it. Thanks, too, for correctly linking the image. SFB, please respond to BlueMoonset's request to expand the review. Thanks, again. Bruin2 (talk) 23:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
  • 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT2a hook ref verified and cited inline. I tweaked the language in the hook. Image is freely licensed and appears in article. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)