Template:Did you know nominations/Yangnyeom chicken

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Yangnyeom chicken

Yangnyeom chicken
Yangnyeom chicken

Created by Jirangmoon (talk). Self-nominated at 07:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC).

ALT1: ... that the developer of Yangnyeom chicken created the dish after analyzing the leftovers of customers in his restaurant?
ALT1a: ... that the restaurateur who developed Yangnyeom chicken created the dish after analyzing his customers' leftovers?
ALT2: ... that Korean fried chicken is known as Yangnyeom chicken in Korea?
ALT2a ... that outside of Korea, Yangnyeom chicken is known as Korean fried chicken?


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

Image eligibility:

QPQ: Unknown
Review is incomplete - please fill in the "status" field

Re: Yangnyeom chikin, Yangnyeom-chikin, Yangnyeom chicken. Why are we captioning this photo as Yangnyeom-chikin, the photo at the article as Yangnyeom chikin, and giving the article the title Yangnyeom chicken? It seems like we need to make these consisten. —valereee (talk) 17:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Apparently chicken is the word used over chikin. I'm still not sure about the word that is used. I did a google search on borth terms, and both are commonly used. Can I Log In (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
OK Valereee, I'll consider the copyedit request as done, but the article still has some issues. I find the Directions section to be borderline encyclopedic. It like a how-to, talking to the reader. I'm not sure about WP:UNDERLINK.Can I Log In (talk) 22:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

I've done too much work at this article to continue review, so we'll need a new reviewer. —valereee (talk) 13:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but this fails the interesting criterion in my book. Is there something we could say other than just listing an ingredient? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Sdkb, nom is very new and nonnative English speaker, may need some guidance, probably also a good idea to ping when their attention is needed here. I'll try to come up with a couple of alts. —valereee (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
ALT1/ALT1a sound good. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Article meets DYK requirements for newness and length. Earwigs detects no close paraphrasing, and given that most of the main sources are in Korean I am also willing to assume good faith on that matter. Of the hooks proposed by both the nominator and Valereee, ALT1 and ALT1a are the most suitable and the most interesting; both are cited inline and referenced to Korean sources. No QPQ needed for the nominator. This is almost good to go; I will give the final approval once Sdkb and Can I Log In can confirm that they no longer have any outstanding issues with the article and hooks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
    Narutolovehinata5, I haven't thoroughly reviewed the current state of the article, but I have no outstanding issues with it. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 11:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
    Narutolovehinata5, I did another quick copyedit, and see no outstanding issues. Can I Log In (talk) 16:36, August 16, 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, we should be good to go now. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)