Template:Did you know nominations/Yellowtail flounder

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Yellowtail flounder

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

The upper side of a yellowtail flounder

• ... that Limanda ferruginea (pictured), the yellowtail flounder, has been suggested to belong in a new genus Myzopsetta? Source: ... Theodore Gill had placed it in the new genus Myzopsetta in 1861. ref, A 2018 ... analysis found that ... L. ferruginea and its relatives ... should be (once again) placed in the genus Myzopsetta ref
  • ALT0a:... that it has been suggested that Limanda ferruginea (pictured), the yellowtail flounder, belongs in a new genus Myzopsetta?
  • ALT1:... that yellowtail flounders (pictured) are able to camouflage and mimic the seafloor? Source: Yellowtail flounders are able to camouflage, changing the pattern of their skin to mimic the seafloor. ref
  • ALT2:... that the yellowtail flounder (pictured), a right-eye flounder, hatches with symmetrical eyes that then shift to the right while maturing? Source: Being a right-eyed flounder (of the family pleuronectidae), both its eyes are on the right side of the fish's body, though the eyes are symmetrical just after hatching. ref
  • ALT3:... that the yellowtail flounder (pictured) is also known as the rusty dab? Source: ref ref

• Reviewed:
• Comment: 2nd nomination, so no QPQ

5x expanded by Eviolite (talk) and Casliber (talk). Nominated by Eviolite (talk) at 13:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Thank you, I enjoyed this article. There is just the small matter of the wording of ALT0. How about something like, "... that it has been suggested that Limanda ferruginea (pictured), the yellowtail flounder, belongs in a new genus Myzopsetta?" Apart from that, I am happy with the content of ALT0a, and I'm happy with ALTs 1, 2 and 3 as they are, although I would suggest that the apparent magic tricks mentioned in ALTs 2 and 3 1 and 2 would attract more hits. Storye book (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

• @Storye book: I think your modified hook is good, so I have added it as hook 0A above. And for clarity, did you mean alts 2 and 3 or 1 and 2? Thanks, eviolite (talk) 11:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you, Eviolite. I have struck out the bits that no longer apply. I am happy with the quality and content of all the hooks as they are now. I personally prefer ALTs 1 and 2 because they will attract more hits. (Sorry about my typo above). Good to go. Storye book (talk) 11:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

ALT1 to T:DYK/P5 without image