Template:Did you know nominations/Zapotitlán metro station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Zapotitlán metro station

  • ... that the pictogram of Zapotitlán metro station depicts a sapote tree that is indented? Source: "The image represents a tree showing the sapotes in its three branches, and in the trunk some Tlantli teeth representing the "tlan" termination. The above, according to the Tribute Codex." (Mexico City Metro (in Spanish))

5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Self-nominated at 02:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC).

  • General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - Not particularly interesting as it is currently written. Perhaps emphasize the "teeth"?
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Just the two issues above. SounderBruce 09:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

  • @SounderBruce: The sources are listed below the paragraph in the hidden table. I deliberately exclude them to avoid adding the same two sources throughout the paragraph (example of how it used to look). Per Wikipedia:Inline citation#In-text attribution: "This is technically a valid inline citation for Wikipedia's purposes" as I already mentioned the sources ("According to the data provided by the authorities").
  • ALT1: ... that the pictogram of Zapotitlán metro station depicts a sapote tree that is indented as its etymology includes the word "Tlantli", which means "tooth" in Nahuatl? (CC) Tbhotch 19:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
    • The old version looked fine to me, and has better verifiability than the current version. The ALT1 hook is really wordy and needs to be cut down. SounderBruce 05:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  • @SounderBruce:. I'm wondering whether you might have missed the above developments? Your reply would be welcome. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 17:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
  • I apologize for not seeing this earlier; it must have been buried in my watchlist. Anyway, the sourcing issue is resolved and ALT1.1 looks better, so it's good to go. SounderBruce 04:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
ALT1.1 to T:DYK/P5