Template talk:Dashboard.wikiedu.org evaluate article

COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Scotland I chose this article because the emergence of this 2020 epidemic caught my attention. I want to know the trend of the epidemic in other countries.

Lead Guiding questions • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is pretty clearly to show readers that the information in the article. It briefly describes the summary of the major sections in the article. Lead report the changes of COVID-19 in the UK and a summary of governments and health care services’ measures to combat the epidemic.

Lead evaluation Content Guiding questions • Is the article's content relevant to the topic? • Is the content up-to-date? • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? • Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? The article’s content relevant to the topic and the content is up-to-date. It is continuously updating the latest data on the impact of the epidemic. The article does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Content evaluation Tone and Balance Guiding questions • Is the article neutral? • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? • Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position and no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. The article is neutral and it does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References Guiding questions • Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? • Are the sources current? • Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? • Check a few links. Do they work? All facts in the article back up by reliable secondary sources of information. These resources link reflect the available literature on the topic. These sources are current. This information comes from data testing and investigation by professional institutions. The links are work.

Sources and references evaluation Organization Guiding questions • Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? • Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? • Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The article is relatively clear, and there are no spelling or grammatical errors. The subtitle is marked in each section. Each section of the article revolves around the topic. For some data display, the article also provides specific charts.

Organization evaluation Images and Media Guiding questions • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? • Are images well-captioned? Are the images of high quality and visually understood by a wide variety of audiences? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinahoChiew (talk • contribs) 16:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC) • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? The images in the article are very clear and can directly express some trend changes or specific situations. All images comply with the copyright regulations of the wiki. However, the image is not very attractive, because the image is small, it seems that the article is very long.

Images and media evaluation Checking the talk page Guiding questions • What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? This article is relatively complete and trustworthy. The information summarized through sources and a clear structure can give readers a convenient reading experience. Wiki discussion on this topic is more academic than us, and it has more specific data and reliable information sources.

Talk page evaluation Overall impressions Guiding questions • What is the article's overall status? • What are the article's strengths? • How can the article be improved? • How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

This article is relatively complete and neutral in general and can describe the development of the epidemic and the different changes in each period to readers more accurately. This article can be updated with the latest data. The article can be improved a little bit in the images, to be more attractive to readers while conveying information. Qchen018 (talk) 13:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I am just going through training--Arina.clavel (talk) 02:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

How do you analyze an article's level of development?--DavidaTamay (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Sjkline3 (talk) 21:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Covid 19

This article gives a guide to Whitneyaj (talk) 01:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Zmuri8 (talk) 03:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Lead Section

The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic The lead include a brief description of the article's major sections The lead does not include information that is not present in the article The lead concise

Content

The article's content could be more relevant to the topic with more specific details of the concept, not just examples. The content is up-to-date There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

The article could be more neutral with less examples and more specific explanations Some claims are biased regarding long - distance relationships and relationships in general Long - distance relationship is overrepresented There is no mention of minority or fringe viewpoints The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position

Sources and References

All facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information Are the sources thorough reflect the available literature on the topic The sources current? The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors, but do not include historically marginalized individuals There should be more sources for this topic Links are working

Organization and writing quality

The article is concise, clear, and easy to read The article has no grammatical or spelling errors The article is well-organized and broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic

Talk page discussion

There is some conversation about the last sentence of the article The article is Start-class rated? It is a part of Wiki Education Foundation This article is to general and it needs more references tied to writers and scientists.

Overall impressions

This article is dissent The article's strengths are well used vocabulary and emotional scale The article can be improved by adding additional sources and sounding less personal The article is well-developed but it needs further extension in order to be complete