Template talk:Did you know/Guillaume Rondelet

Guillaume Rondelet[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... ~~that Guillaume Rondelet (pictured) was such an enthusiastic anatomist that he caused a scandal when he publicly dissected his own son?~~

Reviewed: Peniophora quercina ([1])

5x expanded by Prioryman (talk). Self nom at 18:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: Sharktopus ^talk 19:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: AGF offline source, although online source confirms he publicly dissected his infant son after death. Sharktopus ^talk 21:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: Very interesting, but rather grim, I will propose alts. Sharktopus ^talk 21:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: Nice bold image for display at small size, old enough that it ought to be PD. Sharktopus ^talk 22:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:
ALT1 ... that after the death of his son, Guillaume Rondelet (pictured) tried to learn the cause by performing a public dissection?
ALT1a ... that Guillaume Rondelet (pictured) tried to learn the cause of his son's death by performing a public dissection of the body?
ALT2 ... that 16th-century biologist Guillaume Rondelet (pictured) was mocked by Rabelais in the character of "Rondibilis"?
ALT3 ... that 16th-century biologist Guillaume Rondelet (pictured) grouped finfish together with whales, seals, and crustaceans?
ALT4 ... that 16th-century biologist Guillaume Rondelet (pictured) expelled Nostradamus from the University of Montpellier for being an apothecary and slandering doctors?

Article

Length: Sharktopus ^talk 19:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Sharktopus ^talk 19:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Sharktopus ^talk 22:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: Sharktopus ^talk 22:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Looked for it and did not find. Sharktopus ^talk 22:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio (images): Looked for it and did not find. Sharktopus ^talk 22:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: all OK, made a few copyedits. Sharktopus ^talk 22:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion: An excellent article on a fascinating person, a pleasure to read and review. Thanks for creating this! Sharktopus ^talk 00:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GTG Sharktopus ^talk 00:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]