Template talk:Did you know/LarvalBase

LarvalBase[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... that LarvalBase is an online database which is aiming to complement the extensively accessed database on adult fish, FishBase, by providing parallel information on fish eggs, larvae and fry?

Created by Epipelagic (talk). Self nom at 11:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed: List of posthumous number-one singles (UK) [1]

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: Another "new article is (definition)" hook... No. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:

ALT1 ... that LarvalBase was started to complement Fishbase?

Article

Length: Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): A couple sentences aren't cited (i.e. at the end of a paragraph with no in-text citation) Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: This looks okay. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Doesn't seem to be finished. We have the background, and then... pow. Nothing. What about the history of the project? Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments/discussion:

Hook interest is lacking, and I am worried that this article does not appear to be finished. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Crisco. I agree with your review, since the goal posts for DYKs have changed since I wrote the article. I think it is barely notable, and I can't find sources to expand it, so I've withdrawn it by deleting it from the nominations page. --Epipelagic (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]