Template talk:Dual license with CC BY 2.0

Wikimedia licensing update[edit]

{{editprotected}} Please replace the text under the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL] in this template with under [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's copyright terms]], per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie ⚔ 11:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

This edit request to Template:DualLicenseWithCC-By-2.0 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Could this please be edited to categorise to Category:Wikipedians contributing under CC BY 2.0 and not Category:Wikipedians contributing under CC BY-SA 2.0? The latter had BY-SA in the name, but the category text referred to BY, and I've created the former and corrected the text of the latter in attempt to correct this error. Hence I've been editing the BY templates to categorise to BY, not BY-SA. This one being protected, I cannot fix it. See the code in Template:DualLicenseWithCC-By-2.0/sandbox for the modification I am considering. Thank you. -- thomas.hori (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 05:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 26 July 2021[edit]

This edit request to Template:DualLicenseWithCC-By-2.0 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit template-protected is being considered for merging. ›

I request that this template be moved to Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in Category:Copyright user templates this category should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 16:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse#Protected_edit_request_on_26_July_2021. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]