Template talk:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship

This is the talk page of the group notice for Wikipedia:Requests for adminship and all its subpages.
Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship can only be edited by administrators, page movers, and template editors. All editnotices (except those in userspace) are protected via MediaWiki:Titleblacklist, so the "protection" status as set by the protection tab is mostly irrelevant.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Include instructions for using Template:Rfan in the RfA Editnotice

I moved this question out of QEDK's edit request to a new section to since it was getting lost in the discussion of {{Rfa-question}}, and an edit template-protected request can be opened here if consensus is achieved. QEDK has cleaned up {{subst:Rfan}} and was proposing adding a mention of it to Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Should clerking instructions be added to the edit notice shown to all editors on RfA pages? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, the only reason I put in an edit request for this too was because it seemed fairly uncontroversial. Probably better to take it to WT:RFA to garner any consensus, probably won't solicit much opinions here. --QEDK (愛 • 海) 06:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to include it. We don't need to move the discussion yet again, and WT:RFA has already been pointed to this discussion. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 10:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see that, my bad. --QEDK (愛 • 海) 10:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@QEDK: Looks like there's no opposition, so you might want to draft the actual language and open an edit request. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 26 October 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add:

* While clerking RfA, please exercise discretion and read the [[WP:CIVILITY|civility]] guidelines. You are encouraged to use the {{Tlsp|Rfan}} template to signify discussion moves, striking votes and refactoring comments.

Per previous thread. QEDK (愛 • 海) 16:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done StevenJ81 (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@StevenJ81: Didn't realize the eerie tense, but it should be "struck votes and refactored comments". My apologies. --QEDK (愛 • 海) 17:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- John of Reading (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 5 May 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change proceeeding to proceeding. Thanks, — J947 ^[cont] 04:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done qedk (t 愛 c) 06:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for Adminship/Recent

Is there a way to exclude the above page from the editnotice to be displayed? Toadette ^{(Happy Thanksgiving!)} 09:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update for RFA2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Open to suggestions, of course. Bolding the new changes is a "for now" measure. Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 01:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Special:Diff/1221462571. —⁠andrybak (talk) 02:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]