This template is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
I don't understand what is the reason to include 1912 in the template. Hektor 08:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This convention is observed on every other Olympic Games Sport template, where "gap years" in which the event is not held are indicated as such. It is informative to see that the sport was absent from those Games after it had already been introduced to the Olympic program. See {{Olympic Games Bobsleigh}} for another example - it wasn't held in 1960 because they couldn't afford to build the run. If those gap years are simply omitted, the temptation might be to think that they were forgotten, not intentionally excluded. The same convention is observed in the nation templates for missing years - see {{Infobox Olympics United States}}, where 1980 is indicated the same way, for the boycotted Games. Andrwsc 09:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then why not 1904 ? Hektor 10:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Because that's not a "gap". 1896, 1900, and 1904 are all before the introduction of the sport. If you want to add them in, go ahead, but I don't think that's as useful. Basically, we want to show the sequence of Games covering the span of the sport's history at the Games, but we don't really need to go outside that span. For example, look at {{Olympic Games Snowboarding}}. Would there really be much value in showing all those years before its recent introduction in 1998? Probably not. Andrwsc 16:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
