Template talk:Infobox Australian university ranking

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles

Australia

Infobox Australian university ranking is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

Higher education

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

This template was considered for deletion on 2014 October 24. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

This template was considered for merging with Template:Infobox university rankings on 29 November 2014. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Changes[edit]

I've boldly remove certain fields that are specific to certain sub-disciplines, this was allowing cherry picking of subject rankings such as materials science and geology within the template. I think to be clear we should keep to international and national rankings, otherwise we have to include every subject ranking in the table and that would be a large table! Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reference named auto[edit]

This template is breaking Southern Cross University because it has explicitly named references which clash with the named references in that article. "auto" is a name created by tools for citation re-use, so is it necessary to include it here? If it must be named, could it be named something less likely to clash. Thanks Kerry (talk) 14:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I caused that problem, it should be fixed now. Hopefully my change won't break any other pages Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]