Template talk:Irish Army & Army Reserve

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEurope Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconIreland Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: European Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
European military history task force

Updating template for created articles only[edit]

Fair enough. I'll only update the template with articles that exist. I'll do this on a rolling basis, I've already created a new Defence Forces Training Centre article for inclusion in the template. DojoIrl (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Structure for Template[edit]

It's time some proper structure was put into place for this template. The first section should provide a general and broad overview of the Irish Army, with links at the top. More specific article links then go further below. This is the norm for other mil info boxes on WP. The changes I made earlier were modelled on the British Army template. IrishSpook, if you think otherwise then please provide reasoning here in the talk section instead of unilateral changes. Thanks. DojoIrl (talk) 02:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]