Template talk:Neo-druidism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconReligion Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconNeopaganism Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Talk page for all templates relating to this topic[edit]

Several templates have recently been produced and added to pages within this general area, namely:

I'm a bit concerned that this profusion has taken place without much discussion from editors who work on these articles. Some articles could conceivably be tagged with 3 or 4 of these templates: indeed, Wicca already has three. I mean no criticism of the creators of the templates - but I suggest that this should be discussed centrally so that there is a degree of uniformity in articles within the same family. If you would like to join this discussion, please do not reply here, but go instead to the talk page I have set up for this purpose. Many thanks! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 23:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link to deleted portal removed[edit]

The Neopaganism portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request to rename this Modern Druidry Suggestion[edit]

The page on Neo-druidism has been renamed as Modern Druidry as that is how the language is used in practice, and I think we should change the name of this template to be consistent. Any thoughts or opposition? --- FULBERT (talk) 10:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]