Template talk:ORGCRIT assess table
Bugs[edit]
1. the justification for "secondary" does not appear. 2. The overall value column is not getting autofilled.
e.g. Hi User:Swpb see below example that occured when I tried to use this table. Not sure if I missed something or its a bug in the table. please check. --DBigXrayᗙ 21:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Secondary? | Overall value toward ORGCRIT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outlook | K. N. Govindacharya | ✘ No | |||
Deccan Herald | qweqweqw | qwqwe | weqweq | qweqweqwe |
- To editor DBigXray: There's no bug, you're just using the wrong interior template. You need to create the rows with {{ORGCRIT assess}}, not {{SA}}. {{SA}} is meant for use inside the original {{source assess table}}, and won't work right here. I changed the second row in your example above to show you. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 15:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- oh, thanks a lot User:Swpb for pointing the mistake, in the enthusiasm of using the abbreviated table, I use sa and didnt notice. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- User:Swpb, I believe I had copied these abbreviations from Template:ORGCRIT assess. perhaps the example usage in that page need to be updated as well, since it is showing "Source assess" and "sa", hence the confusion. please take a look. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- oh, thanks a lot User:Swpb for pointing the mistake, in the enthusiasm of using the abbreviated table, I use sa and didnt notice. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
test cases[edit]
@Swpb Please show examples in testcases. rootsmusic (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)