Template talk:RationalSkepticismTasks

Skepticism Template‑class

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

So how is this list maintained? I scanned the history, and see that people just add and remove items. So, I visited an article that was listed for "peer review or POV check", found it OK, and removed it from the list. If this list needs more instruction than that, I guess it should go here. Długosz (talk)

Is there progress on Immanuel Velikovksy? Calling him plain pseudohistorian I find quite misleading as he always called for testing his hypothesis with the then-young C14 method for age determination. Is everyone to be called a pseudoscientist when opposing accepted science doctrine? I don't see irrationality in the writings of Velikovsky, although challenging to scientific dogma. How much room for controversy are you allowing? (Barnabas) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.119.31.252 (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]