Jump to content

Template talk:WSF Ferry Classes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconShips Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Washington Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Convert to standard navbox[edit]

I think this template should be converted to use the standard navbox template, then moved to the bottom of the relevant articles. I see two ways to do this, either:

Option #1:

... or option #2:

The advantage of the first option is that it could also be used as a navbox for the individual ferry articles as well; but, it ends up being a very tall navbox when not collapsed. While the second option is more comparable to the current structure.

Does anyone have a preference on which of these should be used? --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a possinble option #3 (or #2.5), you could use #2 for the class articles, and then make separate navboxes for each class. This would result in smaller boxes which might look nicer, but a fairly large number of separate navboxes. Overall I) think I'd go for #1 as it is the most informative, even if it is quite big. -- Kjet (talk · contribs) 11:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I actually prefer the first option as well. I'll go ahead and make the change, and update the linked articles. If anyone prefers the second, it can easilly be changed down to that later. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 16:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]