Template talk:WikiProject Star Wars

Star Wars Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Image[edit]

I have a feeling that the images on this template do not belong: copyright is one thing, due to the pictures being photographs, but these images are certainly trademarks of Lucasfilm. See WP:FUC. --Geopgeop 12:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the above, I have rotated the image. Let's all WP:BB and update this image every month or so. --Ghetteaux 16:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why would rotating between copyrighted images help? I removed the image. Fair use doesn't apply to template space. Borisblue 01:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you looked at the image page of Image:Lsbleu.jpg, you would see that it is created by a user and is released into the public domain. If you did look at it and thought that the info was incorrect, why didn't you delete it or ask the user about it? I'm putting it back until there is another eason why it doesn't belong. Cbrown1023 21:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't the image that I removed... something weird is going on hereBorisblue 06:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see the problem, Ghatteaux changed the image to the copyrighted Image:Starwarsband.jpg, that I removed. My bad for not checking the history. Borisblue 06:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I knew it wasn't you who changed the image. I knew that it was Ghatteaux and not you, I should have made the clearer in my comment. Cbrown1023 19:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so am I to understand that the new image (this one) is at least a temporary solution? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 19:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Default importance[edit]

OK, question. Why is the importance of articles set to default to Top? How can one know an article is of top importance if it hasn't been assessed yet? The standard default is None in most wikiprojects. The statistics on the main page look... weird because of this. --DanielPharos (talk) 10:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody replied, so I assume that means there are no objections. I've changed it to the unknown-category. --DanielPharos (talk) 10:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]