Template talk:xt

For experiments, see Template:Xt/sandbox.

Similarity to TQ font

Given the similarity between the font colour used for example text in {{xt}} (like this) and that used for quoted talk page text in {{tq}} (like this), there is an RfC at Template talk:Tq#RfC: Change the TQ template font colour to distinguish them. Please have your say there. —sroc 💬 15:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Formatting deprecated parameters

There is a discussion at Template talk:Convert#Formatting of deprecated examples regarding the use of {{!xt}} (compare {{deprecated code}}) to indicate deprecated template parameters and {{xt}} to indicate correct parameters. —sroc 💬 01:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Improved documentation needed and lint fixing too

This (and probably related templates) need improved documentation. Talk:Tom Graves uses markup

{{xt|{{fake heading|sub=3|Tenure}}

which is generating a div-span-flip lint error, and there's no documentation on a "sub" parameter. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

red–green color-blindness

in general, i think it's generally understood that the use of green and red as a visual dichotomy for 'correct' and 'incorrect' (etc.) is outmoded. maybe the templates should adopt blue—red instead? Remsense (talk) 18:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

• Like Democrats and Republicans? EEng 18:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

  if this isn't a joke (and if it is, fine by me!), yeah! i dunno. if the association of red with 'incorrect' is too arbitrary/fraught locally (while we're redesigning the basics) maybe blue—yellow? i'm thinking of accessible color schemes i've seen proposed in dataviz circles. Remsense (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)