User:Askarion/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

{{WikiProject banner shell |class=start|collapsed=no|1=}}

{{resize|60%|({{Abbr|Posted without title|Title added by User:Askarion on Month Day, Year}})}}

added heading per [[WP:TPO]]

{{Talk page of redirect}}

I'm currently in the process of improving and renovating several articles. My current endeavors are listed below.

Userboxes
{{User en}} {{User de-1}} {{User HTML-1}} {{User css-1}} {{User:Dreadfullyboring/userboxes/en-pi-5}} {{User serial comma:Yes}} {{User double spacing:no}} {{User semicolon}}

Askarion


GAME OF THRONES

Bring EVERY episode article to GA Status.

Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg
Gray check markYg Blue question mark? Blue question mark? Green checkmarkY
Blue question mark? Blue question mark?
Blue question mark? Gray check markYg Blue question mark?
Blue question mark?
Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg Gray check markYg
Blue question mark? Blue question mark? Blue question mark? Gray check markYg Gray check markYg
Blue question mark? Blue question mark?


SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES:


ASSORTED FILM AND TELEVISION:


OTHER LONG-TERM PROJECTS

Draft for United States v. Jacobsen

Not to be confused with Jacobson v. United States.
United States v. Jacobsen
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 7, 1983
Decided April 2, 1984
Full case nameUnited States v. Bradley Thomas Jacobsen, et al.
Citations466 U.S. 109 (more)
Case history
PriorUnited States v. Jacobsen, 683 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1982)
Holding
The Fourth Amendment does not require federal agents to obtain a warrant before testing suspicious white powder.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
MajorityStevens, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor, White (Part III)
ConcurrenceWhite
DissentBrennan, joined by Marshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend IV

United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court

Background[edit]

On May 1, 1981, FedEx employees at Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport opened a package that had been damaged by a forklift to examine its contents pursuant to a company policy that required damaged packaged to be opened and examined.[1] The package contained "crumpled newspaper and a 10-inch tube made of silver duct tape".[2]

Opinion of the Court[edit]

TTT

References[edit]

  1. ^ United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 111 (1984) (hereinafter cited as Jacobsen).
  2. ^ Walton, John, III (2016). "Virtually Certain to Frustrate: The Application of the Private Search Doctrine to Computers and Computer Storage Devices". Northern Kentucky Law Review. 43 (3): 465-494. Retrieved July 26, 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links[edit]

Category:United States Supreme Court cases Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Category:1984 in United States case law

SCOTUS-case-stub

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Askarion/sandbox&oldid=1221201888"