User:Donwarnersaklad
LithoLInk testing results are used in urology and nephrology for diagnostic evaluation of kidney stones and other kidney conditions.
Tables of the LithoLink testing results... Reference ranges...
Bibliography... Journal articles... Validity of LithoLink...
Manual...
Statistical analysis...
Presentation of tables...
Typefont sizes...
Typefont embolding...
Compatibility of medical records computer systems...
Compatibility of laboratory results computer systems...
Other laboratories, competing laboratories...
Problematical clinical use of the LithoLink testing results format...
External links[edit]
American Statistical Association Presentation of laboratory medicine results data
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:LithoLink
LithoLink testing results have not included a key with listings of abbreviations used.
A key to abbreviations can be provided here as the laboratory medicine professionals have not yet made available information for patients who would discuss their LithoLink testing results with their doctors more effectively.
LithoLink tables of testing results have not been presented compatibly with other computerized medical records systems at different medical centers.
LithoLink testing results have not included a key to the typefont sizes used relative to the reference ranges for the tests.
LithoLink testing results have not included a key to the typefont embolding used relative to the reference ranges for the tests.
A key can be provided here as the laboratory medicine professionals have not yet made available information for patients who would discuss with their doctors the typefont sizes and typefont embolding used relative to the reference ranges for the tests.
- Are you Google bombing? JFW | T@lk 23:05, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- I guess I see something about what you have suggested either as skeptic or humorously. What I intend is a list that would be developed for more information about this medical laboratory. dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu 06:32, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Does it belong in an encyclopedia? JFW | T@lk 06:56, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- My point of view would be that there should be a wikipedia entry. The clinical laboratory appears to be the only one doing the assays and statistical presentations that specialists with clinical practices in urology and nephrology use routinely. dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu 07:06, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Care to tell us about the tests that cannot be done in any normal medical laboratory? JFW | T@lk 12:33, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Contact the experts, if you would, for example at LithoLink tel 1-800-338-4333 If you would, let whomever reads this know about what you learn...
Don, this is not reasonable. If you think this page was important enough to start, the onus is really on you to tell us why LithoLink is so groundbreaking. JFW | T@lk 18:50, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:LithoLink
LithoLink[edit]
A software program that stores information of kidney stones. No indication of notability, not a breakthrough or radical development in any way. It is also an ad. JFW | T@lk 23:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Apparently the laboratory accomplished what no other clinical laboratory had done. They developed the assays and the statistical presentation of diagnostic testing results for specialists in urology and nephrology. dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu 07:12, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. JFW | T@lk 23:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I cleaned up the stupidness, but no assertion of notability. Mmmbeer 23:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Apparently nobody came along yet to add information. You did delete the content at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LithoLink&oldid=19701514 dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu 07:12, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Donwarnersaklad dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu 07:12, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LithoLink&action=history
LithoLink
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Revision history (Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
Legend: (cur) = difference with current version, (last) = difference with preceding version, m = minor edit
Compare selected versions
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 06:50, 28 July 2005 Jfdwolff m (Reverted edits by Donwarnersaklad to last version by Mmmbeer)
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 06:13, 28 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 23:20, 27 July 2005 Mmmbeer (Corporate site., Removed broken link)
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 23:17, 27 July 2005 Mmmbeer (clean up, wikify... still an ad)
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 22:57, 27 July 2005 Jfdwolff (nonnotable software - delete)
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 08:34, 27 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 07:55, 27 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 07:33, 27 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 07:14, 27 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 18:40, 26 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
* (cur) (last) (_) (_) 18:37, 26 July 2005 Donwarnersaklad
Compare selected versions (Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500). Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LithoLink"
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LithoLink&action=history
__________________________________________________________________________________________
email
dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu
if you would, please consider and contribute to a sketch for a draft for an entry about a strategy for reducing std cases.
the phenomenon of partners coming in to clinics or their doctors saying we haven't had sex yet and want to know our std status.
the strategy of let's get tested together before we have sex... for sexually transmitted infections.
a draft
blogs, links
http://NotB4WeKnow.EditThisPage.com
http://NotB4WeKnow.blog-city.com
on any given day two people can meet and want to have sex. you can get tested together for a number of stds before you have sex.
A Google search of "Don Saklad" (with quotation marks) pulls up over 10,000 hits, which is intriguing, given that he is not known or believed to be a published author or any type of notable figure in any field. Don Saklad appears to have achieved this level of internet notoriety solely through the unique posts he leaves on an extraordinary number of blogs, forums, and just about any websites that allow users to leave comments.
Boy some people got a lot of time on their hands, don't they?
Mr. Saklad's posts almost all revolve around complaints about the Boston Public Library or complaints that Boston City Hall does not provide sufficient public information to individuals requesting it. He will generally post a particular complaint on several dozen internet forums.
They're quite a bit behind the times.
Somebody needs to be reinformed how badly they're informed.
Mr. Saklad's writing style and posting style are unique. He often writes in a "telegraphic" manner characterized by short sentence fragments set off by periods. He rarely responds directly to questions or comments left by other individuals in response to his posts. Although he will post frequently on a forum and will elicit remarks from other posters regarding the content and peculiarities of his posts, he does not engage in conversation with other posters and does not write on topics other than the Boston Public Library and Boston City Hall/City Council. His style is also very impersonal, in that he will compose a post stating that Boston City Hall is not willing to provide a particular extraneous amount of information requested (such as the entire stenographic output of several council meetings), but will not specify that he in particular requested this information.
Mr. Saklad is also known to publish seemingly random lists of information without any additional context. During the spring of 2005, he posted lists of Boston City Council members and their contact information on a number of internet forums. Particularly when he posts lists, he will become obsessive about his posting, for instance, starting separate threads or blog entries each time he comes across the phone number for an additional city council member, rather than adding to his previous threads. A Google search on a line from nearly any posting Mr. Saklad has made will reveal that he has posted the same information on dozens of other sites.
They're attempting to imply something else that he's a stalker looking for assistants.
The don saklad obsessives repeatedly post information about him.
Triangular is a small cotton ball manufactured in a johnson and johnson factory sometime in may 2005. Nobody knows too much about them except that they are obviously a light weight.
Some other don saklad obsessives are the vague sound of a wind chime down the block. A goat shaped lump of rock in northern nevada. Plus many others too numerous to name.
I think that so and so argues that the boil on his ass is inhabited by extraterrestrials.
It's far more interesting to find out who the don saklad obsessives are and why they can't control their writing about him.
We need to find out if they need to be institutionalized or something. We already know this about don saklad,come on!
don saklad's getting all the help he needs.His therapy consists of all the stuff he's posting on the web.
But what therapy do the don saklad obsessives need. Maybe to post more stuff on the web. Great minds don't want to know any more.
*don saklad obsessives
Please do not remove or change this VfD message until the issue is settled
div class="boilerplate metadata" id="vfd" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #EDF1F1; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;"
This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please vote on and discuss the matter. See this article's entry on the Votes for Deletion page.
You are welcome to edit this article, but please do not blank, merge, or move this article, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the Guide to Votes for Deletion. /div
Category:Pages on votes for deletion Category:Pages on votes for deletion
End of VfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point
A Google search of "Don Saklad" (with quotation marks) pulls up over 10,000 hits, which is intriguing, given that he is not known or believed to be a published author or any type of notable figure aside from his internet presence. Don Saklad appears to have achieved this level of internet notoriety solely through the unique posts he leaves on an extraordinary number of blogs, forums, Usenet, and just about any websites that allow users to leave comments.
Mr. Saklad's posts primarily revolve around complaints about the Boston Public Library or complaints that Boston City Hall does not provide sufficient public information to individuals requesting it. He will generally post a particular complaint on several dozen internet forums.
Mr. Saklad's writing style and posting style are unique. He often writes in a "telegraphic" manner characterized by short sentence fragments set off by periods. He rarely responds directly to questions or comments left by other individuals in response to his posts. Although he will post frequently on a forum and will elicit remarks from other posters regarding the content and peculiarities of his posts, he does not engage in conversation with other posters and does not write on topics other than the Boston Public Library and Boston City Hall/City Council. His style is also very impersonal, in that he will compose a post stating that Boston City Hall is not willing to provide a particular extraneous amount of information requested (such as the entire stenographic output of several council meetings), but will not specify that he in particular requested this information.
Mr. Saklad is also known to publish seemingly random lists of information without any additional context. During the spring of 2005, he posted lists of Boston City Council members and their contact information on a number of internet forums. Particularly when he posts lists, he will become obsessive about his posting, for instance, starting separate threads or blog entries each time he comes across the phone number for an additional city council member, rather than adding to his previous threads. A Google search on a line from nearly any posting Mr. Saklad has made will reveal that he has posted the same information on dozens of other sites.
*Don Saklad Haiku Categories: Pages on votes for deletion | Usenet people
the world of don saklad mystery and intrigue. clearly there's got to be a film about this.
and with censorship and suppression, these are the big things at stake here.
and don saklad and his tormenters are at the center of it.
it's a precursor to improvements in the constitution so that dastardly things like this can't happen in the future.
the forces of evil have been let loose in the land.
and good people have to come together to see that they don't succeed.
and don saklad again at the hub of that universe.
future generations will be appreciative.
wikipedia is not private property. or please disabuse me of that.
i didn't destroy anything. i created something.
where there wasn't anything before i created something [1].
that's not vandalism[2].
the people who attempted to destroy what i created are guilty of vandalism unless of course they have a definition of vandalism different than what the dictionary says willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property
then they would not be guilty.
it's not private property.
it's public property.
i'm part of the public and allowed to create things there which is what i've done.
my tormenters on the other hand are guilty of vandalism because they destroyed something.
i put some words there.
they removed them.
isn't that destruction?...
sometimes in order to present a neutral point of view don't you have to present all sides of an issue?...
wouldn't it be important to put people who are less than not notable in the wikipedia?...
isn't a discussion like this exactly part of the lure of don saklad?...
how could you have a wikipedia article about don saklad without including any of this because that if anything demonstrates the nature of the whole issue of don saklad?...
that's yet another aspect of the don saklad saga.
whether he exists at all. a bot. an imaginary person. part of the saga. shouldn't we be including that too?...
the don saklad disaster on wikipedia.